The Left has both.
Category Archives: Needless Deaths
The Violence of the Left
It is an indisputable truth that the left becomes violent when wanting to enforce what they feel is morally correct. I’m sure that you all remember Audi’s Green Police commercial.
There is a group called 10:10 and they advocate cutting your carbon emissions by 10%. However, they want you to know that there’s no pressure. But they advocate blowing up anyone who doesn’t agree with them, including grade school children. Here’s a video of some of their propaganda:
Also, I take issue with you blowing up Agent Skully. On the other hand, if she was willing to participate in this garbage, then she deserves what she gets.
Now, by way of editorial. This is absolutely REVOLTING! It is not funny, it is not cute. It is horrible and disgusting. Shame on 10:10! No apology that you can issue, even though you have tried, can ever make up for what you advocate – you’re honest intentions of saying “join us or die!” You’ll see just how funny these ads aren’t when you’re burning in the afterlife.
When Police Attack (Part II)
Just remember kids, tasers are “less lethal” and safe enough to be used by police against you. But if you try to use one against an officer you get shot.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not advocating for the person now pushing daisies. What he did was stupid. But this is a clear example of how escalation of force can go awry.
Quote of the Day
This isn’t crazy: This is merely the result of a life of never being told “no”; a life full of self-esteem boosting, where everybody else is sent over from central casting to be extras in The Great Life Of Dr. Bishop. This is what happens when the culture of Everybody’s A Winner spends forty years enabling a pure-t sociopath.
A Double Take
When I first read this headline on CNN, Obama promises justice for Christmas terror plotters, I thought, “Wait, he’s going to extend them U.S. Constitutional rights and then give them a get-out-of-jail-free card, just like the others?” Then I read the article and it looks like the war is going to spread to Yemen. Oh, and we’re going to spend billions “training and equipping their security forces.” I wonder how his followers will take this news?
Oh, and one more thing. We all get to be groped when by the TSA now! And of course, the 4th Amendment doesn’t apply because these searches are “reasonable.” Riiiiiiight. And, a new directive also gives airlines the discretion to take other measures to prevent people from secretly assembling or igniting bombs on aircraft. Those measures include prohibiting people from keeping pillows or blankets, or children, or hands on their laps during the final hour of a flight.
Oleg Says
Great leaders seem to think alike:
P.S. If you’re wondering about the word great, remember that Lenin and Mao were held by their respective parties to be great leaders.
Hope and Change
To learn what President Obama’s Safe School Czar wants to teach your children, click here. Warning, it WILL make you sick to your stomach but you should know what The One could be putting in the hands of your children. By the way, you’re not getting any of this from the MSM.
High School Kids, Resource Officers and a Tasers, oh my!
Uncle linked to a story about a TN High School resource officer who used a taser to break up a fight. We seem to hear about taser insidents more and more often in the news.
I have an issue with tasers. As I view it, the level of force increases as the threat level increases. However, using “less-lethal” force distorts the force level to threat level ratio. Let’s use this story as an example. Two HS kids get into a fight. Are weapons present? No. One kid dominating the other and about to kill the other? No. So rather than jumping in and physically separating the two, which I think is the proper level of force given the threat, the resource officer escalates his force to lethal (yes, less-lethal is still LETHAL!).
No, the student didn’t die, but that’s not the point. The officer used excessive force to stop the threat, in my opinion. What do you think?
Political Threats
Political threats take many shapes and forms. What does it say about this country when a politician uses the reading of a bill on the Senate floor as a threat? That’s what Tom Coburn is considering.
Coburn: (threatening) Don’t make me read the health care bill to you!
Blind Followers of Dear Leader: (whining) But, Tom, it’s soooooooooooooo long. 1,990 pages! Some of us don’t want to read it for a reason.
Coburn: I just want “to make sure everyone has a chance to read the bill.”
H/T – Sebastian
Quote of the Day
It’s not the religion. It’s not the guns. It’s the crazy. And no one group has a lock on crazy.
Words That May Echo
… in the United States if our current financial crisis and runaway Federal government spending continues:
Twenty-five percent inflation means ignorance, thieving, corruption, where is the wealth of my nation?
– Mir Hossein Moussavi
I wonder how continued protests and possible civil war will affect the region.
You Must Watch This
I know that you have twenty minutes to learn something new. Watch this powerful two part video.
H/T – Xavier
Across The Pond
This guy gets it. He understand that gun control amounts to only perceived safety. And since our current administration wants so desperately for America to become a European Nation State, maybe our gun-grabbing President and his pet AG will get the memo.
The horror of the school shooting in Winnenden will be followed by calls for Germany’s already restrictive gun laws to be tightened. But the hope that this will work is misplaced.
After the Erfurt school shooting in 2002, guns controls were supposedly strengthened and before that, in 1972, Germany introduced draconian gun laws to combat Baader-Meinhof terrorism. In the first three years after the legislation was passed, German military and police armouries “lost” 34 machine guns, 198 sub-machineguns, 363 automatic rifles and 1,142 pistols: with such firepower available from the organs of the State itself, the Federal Republic did not have enough terrorists to go round. As we in Britain now know, having seen the doubling of handgun crime within five years of our total ban on pistols, “gun control” is a perverse concept.
If the Germans are serious about stopping killers running amok in schools, they might consider the Israeli solution of arming teachers. It works there, as it has on occasion in America – the massacre in the “gun-free zone” of Virginia Tech can be contrasted with the assault by a former pupil on the neighbouring Appalachian Law School in 2002 that was halted by two armed students.
Neither we nor the Germans, of course, would be willing to adopt such a policy. We are more appalled now by the idea of an armed society. Yet an international study published in the Harvard Journal on Law & Public Policy in 2007 found that European nations with high gun ownership levels, such as Switzerland, Norway and Austria, had significantly lower murder rates than European countries with low levels of legal firearms possession.
In Britain we have come a long way from our forebears who believed that guns were a great deterrence: from the days of the Rev Brontë (father of the sisters), who used to fasten his watch and pocket his pistol every morning; or the Yorkshire hotel guests once encountered by Beatrix Potter, all but one of whom were routinely carrying revolvers.
But though we might wish guns had never been invented, our abhorrence of them comes at a price. “Gun controls” disarm only those willing to be disarmed; and the disarmed are then defenceless in the face of predators – criminals, killers, terrorists like the gunmen who shot 200 people dead in Mumbai or, worst of all, predatory states. The disarmament of the Jews from 1933 was the most effective example of gun control in Germany. “The most foolish mistake,” Hitler once remarked, “would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.”
Richard Munday is co-author of Guns & Violence: the Debate Before Lord Cullen
Anyone See Where This Is Going?
Next they’ll be adding those in violation of traffic laws to the list.
